terrorize.dk weblog

MSNBC: U.S. posts wrong photo of ‘al-Qaida operative’ [cache]

For a year and a half, the U.S. government has been asking for the public’s help in finding Midhat Mursi al-Sayid ‘Umar, also known as Abu Khabab al-Masri, a dangerous al-Qaida operative. But now intelligence officials admit to NBC News they were using a photo of a different man.

Måske fordi Khabab aldrig har eksisteret?

NBC News noticed that the photo seemed to bear a striking resemblance to a radical London imam, Abu Hamza Al-Masri.

NBC then located an early television interview with the imam, and compared it with the wanted poster. There are similarities: the unusual white patch of hair, the fold of the shirt collar and the strip of white over his shoulder.

Faktisk ligner den “rigtige” Khabab en manipuleret version af den “forkerte” fra samme udsendelse - derfor er der så mange sammenfald. Også rummet er tydeligvis det samme.
Og navnesammenfaldet er også bemærkelsesværdigt - Abu Khabab al-Masri og Abu Hamza Al-Masri … ikke særlig opfindsomt.
Hvorfor mon CIA tager et billede og forringer kvaliteten og giver manden sort hår, mørkere hud og hvid trøje? Bare en menneskelig fejl? I think not!
CIA kryber selvfølgelig først til korset når bedraget bliver opdaget, men forsikrer os, at …

all other intelligence on Abu Khabab is accurate.

Ja - helt sikkert … og Irak flyder i 100.000 tons af masseødelæggelsesvåben (det gør de faktisk - nu).

The hunt for “Abu Khabab” may now be over. Pakistani intelligence officials say he was killed recently in the Predator missile attack in Pakistan. And that photo on the State Department Web site? It has been replaced with a silhouette.

Mere om missil angrebet her: CIA i missil angreb på pakistansk landsby

Den 16. januar mente end terrorekspert, at Osama meget vel kunne være død -
The Herald Sun: Expert says Bin Laden could be dead

A terrorism expert says he has seen evidence showing al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is either seriously ill or dead.

Dr Clive Williams, director of terrorism studies at the Australian National University, says documents provided by an Indian colleague suggested bin Laden died of massive organ failure in April last year.

Og mon ikke han har været i endnu længere tid. Under alle omstændigheder en situation USA ikke kan sidde overhørig. Dagen efter blev antiterrorambassadør, Henry Crumpton, sendt på banen.

Politiken: USA: Bin Laden er stadig i live

»Vi har ingen efterretninger eller beviser, der tyder på, at han (Bin Laden red.) er død eller ude af stand til at handle, så vores arbejdstese er, at han stadig er i live«, siger Crumpton.

Altså har Crumpton ingen efterretninger eller beviser der tyder på at bin Laden er i live. En temmelig underligt argumentation. Og knapt havde alle glemt hullerne i USAs eventyrlige Osama version, før trolden kom USA til undsætning - igen - 2 dage senere.

Igen slår CIA til og dræber flere uskyldige. Påskudet er som vanligt al-Qaeda, der skal legitimere de alvolige forbrydelser CIA står bag i terror-krigens navn.

Denne gang var målet Zawahiri der i tidernes morgen undslap Egyptens tortur fængsler modsat mange andre. Måske han allerede dengang var dobbeltagent. I de sidste 8 år har han officielt været i skjul for alverdens sikkerhedstjenester.

CIA må have følt på rimelig sikker grund når man uden varsel affyrer ti missiler mod civile mål. Og når man nu var sikker sikker på Zawahiri var tilstede, må man også have vidst at der var både børn, kvinder og andre ikke al-Qaeda relaterede mennesker i de tre bygninger der blev jævnet med jorden. Man må dog undre sig over, at det ikke var muligt for CIA, ISI og/eller meddelere, at stoppe Zawahiri på vej til sit møde - eller på sin vej hjem igen.

CIA må have haft efterretninger der tydede på, at Zawahiri var i landsbyen. Og alligevel er de tilsyneladende ikke i nærheden af ham.

Har den pakistanske efterretningstjeneste andre efterretninger end CIA? Hvordan kan de afvise, at han er blandt ofrerne? De ved måske hvor han i virkeligheden er - og at angrebet har et helt andet formål?

(more…)

Daily Herald: Questions remain from 9/11 report, professor says

A video tape purported to show bin Laden confessing to masterminding the attacks was a fake, Jones said, and other tapes in which bin Laden denied involvement were more likely authentic.

“They have this ’smoking gun confession tape,’ but it’s not him,” he said.

Jones asked why fighter jets did not intercept the planes that hit the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

“Where were our defenses that day? This concerns me deeply,” he said.

He was suspicious about why there was no paper trail showing how the attacks were planned, and asked why the government had not acknowledged finding three of four black boxes from the hijacked airplanes.

There is evidence the government had previous knowledge of the attacks, he said, citing changes in government employee travel plans because of security concerns.

After the second tower was hit, President George Bush sat for about 20 minutes in the classroom where he was reading to children after hearing about the attacks.

Jones asked where Bush’s security officers were. “This is puzzling and disturbing in the sense it’s not explained. I don’t see how it can be explained unless they knew beforehand.”

Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax

For dem som er interesserede i mere af samme, se deres hjemmeside: Scholars for 9/11 Truth

(more…)

The Miami Herald: Avoiding the hard questions

Her bare et par af de spørgsmål Det Hvide Hus med følge ikke ønsker at tale om:

• How did a fire fed by jet fuel, which at most burns at 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit, cause the collapse of the Twin Towers, built of steel that melts at 2,800 degrees? (Most experts agree that the impact of airliners, made mostly of lightweight aluminum, should not have been enough alone to cause structural failure.) How could a single planeload of burning jet fuel — most of which flared off in the initial fireball — cause the South World Trade Center tower to collapse in just 56 minutes?

• Why did building WTC-7 fall, though no aircraft struck it? Fire alone had never before caused a steel skyscraper to collapse.

• Why did all three buildings collapse largely into their own footprints — in the style of a controlled demolition?

• Why did no U.S. military jet intercept the wayward aircraft?

• Why has there been no investigation of BBC reports that five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were alive and accounted for after the event?